On August 5, 2025, President Trump signed an EOEstablishing the White House Task Force on the 2028 Summer Olympicstaking the coordination efforts away from California and putting them under the purview of the Federal Government to: maximize safety, secure borders, and offer world-class transportation for the millions of expected visitors. The President will be the chair and the VP will be the vice chair of this Task Force. The VP will designate an Executive Director to perform the day-to-day operations. The rest of the task force will be comprised of:
Secretary of State;
Secretary of the Treasury;
Secretary of Defense;
Attorney General;
Secretary of Commerce;
Secretary of Transportation;
Secretary of Homeland Security;
Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff;
Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs;
Assistant to the President and Deputy Chief of Staff;
Assistant to the President and Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy and Homeland Security Advisor;
Assistant to the President and Deputy Chief of Staff for Legislative, Political and Public Affairs;
Assistant to the President and Deputy Chief of Staff for Communications and Cabinet Secretary;
Assistant to the President and Deputy Chief of Staff for Strategic Implementation;
Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation;
Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission; and
heads of such other executive departments, agencies, and offices that the Chair or the Vice Chair may, from time to time, designate or invite to participate.
The Task Force will expect cooperation and coordination from executive departments and agencies to "assist in the planning, organization, and execution of events surrounding the Games." The Task Force will be finished on December 31, 2028 (unless President Trump sees a need to continue its existence).
The Task Force will:
coordinate Federal planning and response related to the security, transportation, and entry/exit processes for the Games;
support interagency cooperation and information-sharing with State and local partners;
identify legal, logistical, or regulatory barriers that could impede effective Federal support for the Games and recommend timely solutions;
assist in the planning and implementation of visa processing and credentialing programs for foreign athletes, coaches, officials, and media personnel; and
ensure operational readiness across law enforcement, counterterrorism, transportation, and emergency response functions.
The accompanying Fact SheetPresident Donald J. Trump Establishes White House Task Force on the 2028 Summer Olympicsstates the Task Force will maximize the economic and cultural impact of the Games anticipating them to be the largest Games ever and the first hosted in the US since 2002. The Games are expected to bring an $18,000,000,000 boom to our economy, especially in the tourism and hospitality industry which has suffered ever since the covid scamdemic.
Because the President has decided it is "imperative" that the US make "appropriate preparations to secure the safety of all athletes and spectators" I suspect this next 3 1/2 years will be focused on removing illegal aliens and other criminals from both the city of Los Angeles as well as the state of California due to the lawlessness we have been seeing happening there on a daily basis. Not only will the US population in California benefit from this focused effort to make the area safe, but the rest of the country shall benefit as well. ICE will be well-versed in rounding up illegals with concise, focused efforts; especially if they use LA as a training ground for all the new applicants that are clamoring to become part of the greatest immigration law enforcement effort ever.
President Trump and MAHA Chief Kennedy are taking every opportunity to showcase US strength, spirit, patriotism, economy, and hospitality as we celebrate our 250th Birthday in 2026 starting with:
Revitalizing the President's Council on Sports, Fitness, & Nutrition
Revising the SNAP program to contain more nutritionally balanced foods
Hosting the 2026 FIFA World Cup, the 2025 Ryder Cup, and the 2026 President's Cup
Protecting collegiate sports to include removing men from women's sports and protecting athletes
The President is seizing the opportunities presented by hosting the 2028 Olympics to "unite our nation, celebrate American excellence, and reinforce our status as the premier global destination for major events."
LA Olympics Chair Casey Wasserman says the Olympics will be the equivalent of producing 7 superbowls a day for 30 days. He has also indicated that the Olympic Torch will travel through all 50 states and offered President Trump an opportunity to carry the Torch.
On August 5, 2025 the White House published the articleOn CNBC, President Trump Touts Historic First Six Monthsoutlining President Trump's 36 minute interview (see video below) on CNBC's Squawk Box and the major points he brought up as successes in the first 6 months in his 2nd Term.
23-1197 CFX LANDOR V. LOUISIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS - religious exercise
23-1209 CFX M & K EMPLOYEE SOLUTIONS, LLC V. TRUSTEES OF THE IAM PENSION FUND - which actuarial assumptions should be adopted to compute withdrawal liability
24-38 CFX LITTLE V. HECOX - does banning males from female sports violate Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment
24-43 CFX WEST VIRGINIA V. B. P. J - Does Title IX prevent 1) designating or 2) offering girls and boys teams based on biological sex determined at birth
24-171 CFX COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC. V. SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT - is simply knowing about someone else's copyright infringement activities sufficient to find them guilty of willfulness under 17 USC 504(c)
24-345 CFX FS CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES CORP. V. SABA CAPITAL MASTER FUND, LTD. - the question presented is whether Section 47(b) of the ICA, 15 USC 80a-46(b), creates an implied private right of action
24-351 CFX POSTAL SERVICE V. KONAN - plaintiffs claim post office intentionally did not deliver mail to designated addresses and are claiming damages for loss or miscarriage of letters or postal matter under 28 USC 2680(b)
24-440 CFX BERK V. CHOY - conflict of rules in state vs federal court where states dismiss cases for reasons not supported by federal courts
24-482 CFY ELLINGBURG V. UNITED STATES - is criminal restitution under Mandatory Victim Restitution Act (MVRA) is penal for purposes of the Ex Post Facto Clause
24-539 CFX CHILES V. SALAZAR - do conversations between counselors and their clients based on the viewpoints expressed (religious) regulate conduct or violate the Free Speech Clause
24-556 CFY FERNANDEZ V. UNITED STATES - does granting early release from prison for "extraordinary and compelling reasons" warrant a discretionary sentence reduction under 18 USC 3582(c)(1)(A)include reasons that may also be alleged as grounds for a vacatur of a sentence under 28 USC 2255
24-557 CSY VILLARREAL V. TEXAS - does a trial court abridge the defendant's 6th Amendment right to counsel when they prohibit the defendant and his counsel from discussing the defendant's testimony during an overnight recess
24-568 CFX BOST V. ILLINOIS STATE BD. OF ELECTIONS - Federal law sets the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November as the federal Election Day per 2 USC 1 and 7; and 3 USC 1. Several states, including Illinois, have enacted state laws that allow ballots to be received and counted AFTER election day. Petitioners contend these state laws are preempted under the Elections and Electors Clauses. Petitioners sued to enjoin Illinois' law allowing ballots to be received up to 14 days after Election Day. The question is whether Petitioners, as federal candidates, have pleaded sufficient factual allegations to show Article III standing to challenge state time, place, and manner regulations concerning their federal elections.
24-621 CFX NRSC V. FEC - does placing limits on coordinated party expenditures in 52 USC 30116 violate 1st Amendment, either on their face or as applied to party spending in connection with "party coordinated communications" as defined in 11 CFR 109.37.
24-624 CSY CASE V. MONTANA - can law enforcement enter a home without a search warrant based on less than probable cause that an emergency is occurring, or whether the emergency-aid exception requires probable cause.
24-724 CFX HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP, INC. V. PALMQUIST - 1) does a district court's final judgement as to completely diverse parties must be vacated when an appellate court later determines that it erred by dismissing a non-diverse party at the time of removal and 2) does plaintiff defeat diversity jurisdiction after removal by amending the complaint to add factual allegations that state a colorable claim against a nondiverse party when the complaint at the time of removal did not state such a claim.
24-758 CFX GEO GROUP, INC. V. MENOCAL - is an order denying a government contractor's claim of derivative sovereign immunity immediately appealable under the collateral order doctrine.
24-777 CFX URIAS-ORELLANA V. BONDI, ATT'Y GEN. - must a federal court of appeals defer to the Board of Immigration Appeals judgment that a given set of undisputed facts does not demonstrate mistreatment severe enough to constitute "persecution" under 8 USC 110(a)(42)
24-781 CFX FIRST CHOICE WOMEN'S RESOURCE V. PLATKIN - when the subject of a state investigatory demand establishes a reasonably objective chill of its 1st Amendment rights, is a federal court in a first-filed action deprived of jurisdiction because those rights must be adjudicated in state court
24-783 CFX ENBRIDGE ENERGY V. NESSEL - do district courts have authority to excuse the 30 day procedural time limit for removal in 28 USC 1446(b)(1)
24-808 CFX CONEY ISLAND AUTO PARTS, INC. V. BURTON - does Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(c)(1) set a time limit in which to set aside a void default judgement for lack of personal jurisdiction
24-813 CFX CHEVRON USA INC. V. PLAQUEMINES PARISH - 1) does a causal-nexus or contractual-direction test survive the 2011 amendment to the federal-officer removal statute and 2) can a federal contractor remove to federal court when sued for oil-production activities undertaken to fulfill a federal oil-refinement contract
24-820) CFY RUTHERFORD V. UNITED STATES - when 4 circuits permit but 6 prohibit, can a district court consider disparities created by the First Step Act's prospective changes in sentencing law when deciding if "extraordinary and compelling reasons" warrant a sentence reduction under 18 USC 3582(c)(1)(A)(i)
24-860) CFY CARTER V. UNITED STATES - consolidated with item #23 case 24-820 above with same questions
24-872 CFH HAMM V. SMITH - limited to the following question: Whether and how courts may consider the cumulative effect of multiple IQ scores in assessing an Atkins v. Virginia claim
24-924 CFX HENCELY V. FLUOR CORP. - Should Boyle v. United Technologies Corp be extended to allow federal interests emanating from the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) combatant-activities exception to preempt state tort claims against a government contractor for conduct that breached its contract and violated military orders
24-993 CFX OLIVIER V. CITY OF BRANDON - In the Case where a Christian is arrested and fined for violating an ordinance targeting "protests" outside a public amphitheater by speaking of the Gospel, was it a violation of his 1st & 14th Amendment rights - 1) Whether, as the 5th Circuit holds in conflict with the 9th and 10th Circuits, this Court's decision in Heck v. Humphrey bars 1983 claims seeing purely prospective relief where the plaintiff has been punished before under the law challenged as unconstitutional and 2) Whether, as the 5th Circuit and 4 other Circuits hold in conflict with 5 other Circuits, Heck v. Humphrey bars 1983 claims by plaintiffs even where they never had access to federal habeas relief.
24-1056 CFY RICO V. UNITED STATES - does the fugitive-tolling doctrine apply in the context of supervised release
24-1021) 1 CSX GALETTE V. NJ TRANSIT CORP. - is the New Jersey Transit Corporation entitled to interstate sovereign immunity under the Federal Constitution as held by the hig1056 above with same question
24-5438 CFH BOWE V. UNITED STATES - 1) does 28 USC 2244(b)(1) apply to a claim presented in a second or successive motion to vacate under 28 USC 2255 and 2) does 28 USC 2244 (b)(3)(E) deprive this Court of certiorari jurisdiction over the grant or denial of an authorization by a court of appeals to file a second or successive motion to vacate under 28 USC 2255
24-5774 CFY BARRETT V. UNITED STATES - 1) does the Double Jeopardy Clause permit 2 sentences for an act that violates 18 USC 924(c) and 924(j), a question that divides seven circuits but about which the Solicitor General and Petitioner agree and 2) Whether "Hobbs Act robbery qualifies as a crime of violence under 924(c)(3)(A), a question left open after" United States v. Taylor, 596 US 845 (2022) and United States v. Stoney, 62 F 4th 108, 113 (3rd Circuit 2023).
24-109) ATX LOUISIANA V. CALLAIS - Middle District court of Louisiana and 5th Circuit affirmed that Louisiana likely violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) when it failed to create a second majority-Black congressional district. Middle District court demanded it's preferred map be adopted. The State chose to pass S.B.8, which created a 2nd majority-Black district as demanded by the courts, protected the Legislature's sovereign perogatives, and achieved its political goals. However, a 3-judge court in the Western District of Louisiana enjoined SB 8 as an unconstitutional racial gerrymander leading to the following questions for SCOTUS: 1) did the majority err in finding that race predominated in the Legislature's enactment of S.B.8, 2) Did the majority err in finding that S.B.8 fails strict scrutiny, 3) Did the majority err in subjecting S.B.8 to the Gringles preconditions, and 4) is this action non-justiciable. [See my August 4, 2025 ANP Articlefor an explanation of gerrymandering.]
24-110) ATX ROBINSON V. CALLAIS - consolidated with item #32 case 24-109 above with same questions
24-413 CFX DEPT. OF EDUCATION V. CAREER COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS OF TX - The administrative process used by the Department of Education was revised and strengthened to allow for group resolution of defenses with common facts. The 5th Circuit suspended the implementation of these rules: 1) did the court of appeals err in holding that the Education Act does not permit the assessment of borrower defenses to repayment before default, in administrative proceedings, or on a group basis; and 2) did the court of appeals err in ordering the district court to enter preliminary relief on a universal basis
I do not see the citizenship case in this list. I was under the impression that the question as to citizenship being granted "simply because you were born in the US but your parents are LEGAL citizens of other countries" case would be heard in October 2025. I wonder why it is not on the list.
What we tear down must serve to build something better. Let your hands be ready - for labor and liberty both.
Oliver graduated Yale College at the top of his class in 1747. Upon his graduation, New York Governor, George Clinton, gave him a Captain commission and ordered him to raise a militia company to fight in the French and Indian Wars. Oliver defended the northern frontier, and Canadians, from the French in 1748. Afterward, he briefly studied medicine but did not set up a practice because he returned to Litchfield. He became Litchfield's first Sheriff and served in that role from 1751 to 1771.
Oliver married Lorraine Collins on January 21, 1755 in Gilford, Belknap, New Hampshire. They had 5 children, 4 of whom lived to adulthood.
Oliver was selected he was named a commissioner of Indian affairs for the northern department, meeting with representatives of the Six Nations at Albany. He helped settle the Wyoming Valley boundary question. He was also involved in the New York v. Vermont boundary question.
In 1775, Oliver was elected to the Continental Congress; but, he became seriously ill and had to leave the Congress in 1776 making him unable to sign the Declaration of Independence until much later. As he was traveling home, he went through New York when General George Washington ordered the newly approved Declaration of Independence be read to all the troops on July 9, 1776. After the reading, New York Patriots toppled the statue of King George III, sending the head back to England in a graphic display of rebellion.
Oliver, on the other hand, saw use for the rest of the statue, so he had the remaining pieces loaded into a wagon and shipped to his home in Litchfield. Oliver used the statue to make bullets for the army to use against the British. It is estimated that over 40,000 bullets were poured from that one statue.
Oliver was recovered from his illness by October 1776 and returned to Congress, signing the Declaration upon his return. Congress promoted him to Brigadier General assigned him command of troops in Connecticut.
Oliver served as a member of the Congress of the Confederation from 1781 to 1784. He served as Connecticut's 23rd Lieutenant Governor from 1786-1796 and as 19th Governor from 1796-1797 when then current Governor, Samuel Huntington, died on January 5, 1796.
Oliver died December 1, 1797 while in office as Governor in Farmington, Hartford County, Connecticut at age 71. He is interred at East Cemetery in Litchfield, Litchfield County, Connecticut. In 1971, Oliver's home in Litchfield was declared a National Historic Landmark. Fort Washington, an active fortification until 1936, in Newport, Rhode Island was renamed Fort Wolcott in 1798.
Those are some of the exact words used by Googles censors, aka 'Orwelliancontent police,' in describing many of our controversial stories.Stories later proven to be truthful and light years ahead of the mainstream media. But because we reported those 'inconvenient truths' they're trying to bankrupt ANP.
